Weblog

Sunday, 06 September 2009

  • "Church" - does it matter what we call it?

    I believe that our misuse of the word "church" is not only evidence of incorrect thinking, but its misuse severely undermines our understanding of who we are and who we're called to be. A problem is that this idea often comes across as hair-splitting or a useless exercise in semantics. I'm convinced, however, that it's of critical importance.

    Which one of us would say, "Thank goodness it's Friday! I'm looking forward to going to family and crashing in the recliner." Of course, you might say, "It's family night," but in doing so you wouldn't be thinking of your family as an activity. You'd be describing and thinking of a group of people.

    Splitting hairs? Isn't it at least a little bit odd that out of 118 uses of the Greek word "ekklesia" (which is translated "church") in the New Testament, not a single usage refers to an activity? Each refers to a collective group of believers. (note: some manuscripts claim 111 uses, and in three cases it may be tenuously argued that the word means something vaguely like a verb)

    As we've done with the word "witness," with incredible effectiveness, we've confined "church" to an event that occurs in a designated, finite time and space. We no longer think of "church" as a family of believers. Instead we think of it as an event or activity in which we have the option to participate or not. Further, we're encouraged to bring as many non-believers as possible to these events so that they can listen to the pastor and get saved. At the very least, here's what we've done in the above paragraph:

    • Removed the bond of family from the body of believers. "Church" is not a unit now; it is an event.
    • Acknowledged that our off-hours (if we consider Sunday morning only) -- the other 166 hours of the week, literally 98.9% -- do not include "church"
    • Assigned our command from Jesus Christ -- to be witnesses -- to be handled by a professional Christian
    • Reassigned ourselves from the task of going and making disciples to inviting people to sit with us and hoping that they become disciples

    Whether or not we'd like to admit it, these lines of thought come directly from the understanding we now have of "church". Our incorrect use of this word simply and accurately represents how we view ourselves. How pervasive is this thinking? Do a Google image search for the word and you'll see what it means not only to believers, but to the rest of the world.

    If we've given this word a new meaning, how then do we refer to the actual ekklesia? (I'd venture to say that we don't refer to it very often.)

    As a side note, piggy-backing onto a post about teens giving up on Christianity, if this is all that they think church is, is it really all that surprising that teens find nothing life-changing about it, or even that they might find the whole thing boring?

Monday, 04 May 2009

  • Prayer in Schools - Sickness or Symptom?

    My 10-year-old daughter received an e-mail with a poem lamenting the absence of prayer in schools and talking about the general state of the nation today where its outlook on God is concerned. You've probably received an e-mail like it. After she read it, I asked if I could talk to her about it. My perspective is a little different from that of many people (shocker, I know).

    I offered my daughter a parallel that I hoped would help her to see it in a different way. My story came before the wave of medical caution had begun to spread through the United States and began to impact our local community (many schools closed last week and remain closed today in an effort to prevent the spread of the H1N1 virus).

    Here's my analogy: when a child is sick, often she'll be taken to the doctor. Once the doctor has gone through a battery of tests to determine what exactly the sickness is, he'll offer his diagnosis and recommended treatment. Say the symptoms are fever, chills, sore throat, fatigue, and cough, and the doctor determines that it's the common form of the flu. The doctor's medical expertise is going to give him the wisdom to prescribe something to attack and destroy the virus. While he may give something to treat the symptoms, too, it's likely that he won't send the patient away and treat only the chills, recommending that she bundle up with a heavy blanket.

    This is what I believe we're prone to do with issues like prayer in public schools. I've heard many, many people say that America entered into moral decline when prayer was legislated out of public schools. While I have no great argument that this moral decline happened to coincide with the removal of prayer, this wasn't a cause/effect situation.

    The standard logic seems to be that if we could somehow get prayer and the legal mention of the name "Jesus Christ" legislated back into the school system (or at least allowed again), things would begin to look up again and all eyes would begin to turn back to God. In reality, the removal of prayer from public schools was a reflection of the spiritual condition of the leadership in (and the population of) the United States of America.

    This idea that the removal of prayer from schools was a catalyst rather than an effect causes many Christians to take a leap into attacking politicians, parties, and political philosophies. It necessarily becomes a battle of religion vs. politics, and the reality of a personal relationship with Christ -- the very thing that could give the situation hope -- is left as an "Oh, by the way" issue at best. It's as if we're trying to convert a political party, and our method of "conversion" seems to be more like a bloody crusade than Godliness, prayer, and meekness.

    1 Timothy 2:1-4 (NLT) says this: I urge you, first of all, to pray for all people. Ask God to help them; intercede on their behalf, and give thanks for them. Pray this way for kings and all who are in authority so that we can live peaceful and quiet lives marked by godliness and dignity. This is good and pleases God our Savior, who wants everyone to be saved and to understand the truth.

    I desperately want America to become a Christian nation. It isn't one. The "conversion" of America will not happen by bludgeoning politicians with a Jesus stick or a forced movement of the "religious right". It can only come as individual hearts are changed and hearts and eyes are turned to Christ. It can be started and helped along by Christ-following men and women serving God in positions of political influence. But neither morality nor Godliness can be legislated.

    To be clear, I'm not advocating that we shy away from all political issues. We cannot sit idly and allow state-sanctioned, legalized abortion to continue, for instance (and this is not the only issue). But for Christians who are content to simply hurl stones at people in political office and expect it to somehow turn hearts to God, look for yourself to see if this kind of activity is supported Biblically. If it is, keep it up. If it's not, stop it. God has a purpose for you -- a particular way He wants you to participate in seeing His will accomplished here and now, and in the future -- and I'd contend that it's not found in that sort of action (or inaction).

Tuesday, 24 March 2009

  • When is it Okay to Withhold Information?

    I was having a discussion with a friend the other day and this question came up: is it ever okay to selectively withhold information? We were speaking about matters in the Church, so that's the way I'm framing this.

    With children and parents, sometimes situations get to the point of answering,"Because I told you so," because eventually a parent just doesn't want to hear the child argue with him (again) and knows that it will happen if he presents the legitimate reason. Or sometimes we may withhold information either because it's not necessary for the child to know, or it would be harmful for him to know it.

    That's a parallel that sounds very reasonable. But once we're all grown up and when we apply it to the Church, does it still hold water? In what situations would it fall in line with Christ-like character to withhold information? What's the precedent or Scriptural principle that we can apply to know when it's okay to do so?

    If we reveal only bits and pieces of something because we think that someone wouldn't understand (heaven forbid politics ever entering discussions in a church; that never happens), isn't that making an assumption about them that we're often not qualified to make, and doesn't that make us place our own position or understanding higher than that of others?

  • Do Good to Those Who... are apathetic?

    This post is duplicated from my main site, www.deanlusk.com.

    Funny thing... I've found that I don't seem to have nearly as much trouble relying on God, listening to Him, and obeying Him in times of extreme circumstances as I do when things are middle-of-the-road. Is that just me, or is it something you've noticed in yourself?

    Jesus said, "Love your enemies! Do good to those who hate you." When someone hates me, that's a pretty easy thing to identify, and therefore an immediate red flag pops up with the associated message, "Love this person and do good to them." Following that directive may not always be as easy as identifying it, but it's immediately on my mind.

    Likewise, when something extremely good has happened or I'm in a worship service where the Spirit is at work, it's incredibly easy to focus on God and want to talk to Him and thank Him for everything.

    But what about the medium things? Situations and people that insult our sense of pride but wouldn't go as deep as letting us put someone in the "enemy" category?

    (I'm going to identify a couple of dining establishments here. Is it taboo to name them in writing? Hope not...)

    My family went to McDonald's over the weekend and it was obvious when I ordered that I was simply a bother to the crew there. ("Customers? Bah! Who needs 'em?!") We went to the "convenient" drive-through and I had to go inside twice to assist them in getting our order correct. We ate at PF Chang's yesterday after my son had a minor medical procedure (the restaurant was his choice of cuisine as a sort of reward for vigilance) and we had a similar experience. I felt rotten after we left the place for not having asked our waitress if everything was okay and asking to pray with her. Apparently we were there for her convenience, and it showed.

    These people weren't my enemies; they were apathetic. That's almost worse. Think about it; when someone is apathetic toward you, it says that you're so low and inconsequential that you don't really even register on their radar screen.

    In those sorts of situations I find it oddly difficult to think like a genuine Christ-follower. I can probably act like it, but if it's not coming from a pure and authentic heart, I've got serious unresolved issues.

    "You have heard that our ancestors were told, ‘You must not murder. If you commit murder, you are subject to judgment.’ But I say, if you are even angry with someone, you are subject to judgment!" - Jesus, in Matthew 5:21-22 (NLT)

    (Special thanks to Jan Owen and a few other great bloggers.)

Monday, 23 March 2009

Laudio

  • Visit Laudio's Revelife Site
    • Name: Dean Lusk
    • Gender: Male
    • Member Since: 3/18/2009

Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

About Me

  • Christ-follower, husband and dad, and an artsy, disorganized person.

Groups

[no groups]

Pulse

Laudio has no pulse!...

Recommended

[no recommendations]